Jane Chi vs Jolene Watanabe-Giltz Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
L L L W L L W L L LHead To Head: Chi 1 - 1 Watanabe-Giltz
They have played 5 sets in total, with Chi winning 2 and Watanabe-Giltz winning 3. The last match between Chi and Watanabe-Giltz was at the Bank of the West Classic - Stanford, California, 23-07-2001, Q1 round, Hard with Jane Chi getting the victory 6-3 6-7(6) 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jane Chi | 1 |
| Jolene Watanabe-Giltz | 1 |
| Chi | Stats | Watanabe-Giltz |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 136 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 50 | Age | 56 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (76-63) | Career Total W/L | 23% (9-30) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Chi VS Watanabe-Giltz H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(6) 6-0 | |||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Chi VS Watanabe-Giltz H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 22 | Games Won | 22 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jane Chi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Jolene Watanabe-Giltz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (76/63) | Win/Loss | 23% (9/30) |
| 53% (167/146) | Sets Win/Loss | 27% (24/65) |
| 52% (1448/1359) | Games Win/Loss | 40% (311/461) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 420.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 294.82 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (75/137) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 21% (8/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (11/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 61% (22/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 90% (77/69) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (12/8) |
| 10% (77/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (12/4) |
| 13% (62/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (27/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
